These strategies can be combined to represent different operating scenarios. For example, a model can use
Loading Priority during the detailed train schedule, account for Tank Car Turnaround, and then switch to Direct Flow after the scheduled period ends. This combination allows the simulation to move from detailed operational modeling to simplified long-term analysis without changing the model structure. The result is a flexible approach for studying loading rack capacity, loading rack utilization, refinery logistics, transportation demand, and long-term operations.
The appropriate strategy depends on the simulation objective.
Loading Priority is suitable when detailed loading operations and train departure conditions are important. Direct Flow is preferable when the loading rack only represents an aggregated connection between storage and transportation. For longer simulation horizons, Post-Schedule Operation defines what happens after the detailed train plan ends, while Tank Car Turnaround adds a realistic fleet constraint. Together, these strategies allow a loading rack simulation to balance operational detail, computational efficiency, and realistic refinery logistics behavior.